[vdr] VDR not starting properly with softdevice on boot
kari at kniivila.com
Tue Jan 16 22:34:01 CET 2007
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
>> For some reason I can not get it to load automatically
>> with udev settings. There is a
> There is a what?
There was something braking my thoughts. Dont really know now what I was
going to say :) I'll get back to that if it comes to mind.
> You could add matroxfb to /etc/modules.
There is no /etc/modules file in FC but there is rc.modules in which I
>>> I'm using a statically compiled matroxfb. I've used vdr+softdevice for
>>> almost 2 years now, and I haven't had any problems for about a year.
>>> (I reported quite a few issues that were fixed.)
>> I selected vdr+softdevice with matrox because I've read so many good
>> things about it. Like small cpu resource needs since I've got only PII
> I have a Celeron running at 900 MHz, and the CPU load is around 60%.
> The VGA output of the Matrox saves some 10% or 20% of CPU, because
> the colour space transformation can be avoided. But I'm using the
> TV output with a self-built Matrox to SCART cable.
I have a self-built cable also.
>> What should I do to get debugging info since there is nothing in the
> Attach strace to the vdr process to see the system calls. Redirect the
> output to a file, and kill vdr after a couple of seconds.
> Or start OProfile with opcontrol for a few seconds during the CPU
> diversion. After opcontrol --stop, you can view the statistics with
> something like opreport -l /path/to/vdr|less
> I don't know if the Pentium II implements any performance counters.
> I've only run OProfile on Celeron and later processors from Intel and AMD.
My typo, I ment PIII 550 :)
>> Log shows that vdr seems to have started normally and I can get
>> a picture which ofcource is a slideshow of still pictures because of the
>> cpu load. Normally changing to a radiostation drops cpu load to some 5%
>> but even that dont have any effect. Only restarting vdr helps.
>> Can poor antenna signal cause something like this? Normally I have cable
>> at home and I and constructing a "new" vdr to be taken to my summer home
>> where we have aerial. At home my dvb-t signal if avfully poor.
> Poor antenna signal used to crash softdevice, but I'm not sure about the
> CPU load. I usually have very good reception, so I cannot say. Does it
> make any difference if you suspend the output of softdevice?
I have to test this out. top shows that its vdr that takes all the cpu
but I hav to use one of the methods you mentioned to check the real reason.
More information about the vdr