[vdr] VDR with S2API (update)
halim.sahin at t-online.de
Fri Dec 12 21:30:54 CET 2008
On Fr, Dez 12, 2008 at 09:06:02 -0800, VDR User wrote:
> I can say I've seen many people move away from VDR because it doesn't
> provide a good solution to this. After years of using standalone VDR
> boxes, I too would love if we had the option to use a networked VDR
> with each client being exactly as you described... Diskless, and only
> with ethernet cable + IR sensor, and each with an own OSD to control
> his VDR thread.
This would add more complexity to vdr and make it unstable.
BTW. VDR is a video disk recorder not a media center??
I don't know an other multimedia project like vdr wich works
stable like vdr.
Maybe those people who wants such a networking capable vdr should fork it and
implement the needed features?
Please stop writing
Many people move away from vdr etc.
if they have a working solution it is ok.
In this case there is an alternative to vdr and Klaus doesn't
need to implement such features.
Just my two cents.
More information about the vdr