Difference between revisions of "V4L capturing"

From LinuxTVWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Live x264 capture comparison)
m (Live x264 capture comparison)
Line 59: Line 59:
 
<th>application</th>
 
<th>application</th>
 
<th>a/v sync</th>
 
<th>a/v sync</th>
<th>file size</th>
 
 
<th>efficiency</th>
 
<th>efficiency</th>
 
<th>streaming</th>
 
<th>streaming</th>
Line 67: Line 66:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td></td>
+
<td></td>
<td></td>
 
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
Line 75: Line 73:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>ffmpeg</td>
 
<td>ffmpeg</td>
<td>middling</td>
+
<td>middling</td>
<td>small</td>
 
 
<td>good</td>
 
<td>good</td>
 
<td>yes</td>
 
<td>yes</td>
Line 84: Line 81:
 
<td>mencoder</td>
 
<td>mencoder</td>
 
<td>great</td>
 
<td>great</td>
<td>smaller</td>
 
 
<td>poor</td>
 
<td>poor</td>
 
<td>no</td>
 
<td>no</td>
Line 91: Line 87:
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>transcode</td>
 
<td>transcode</td>
<td>good</td>
+
<td>good</td>
<td>small</td>
 
 
<td>great</td>
 
<td>great</td>
 
<td>yes</td>
 
<td>yes</td>
Line 101: Line 96:
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
<td></td>
 
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
Line 138: Line 132:
   
 
I tried three different CPUs -- a dual Opteron 240, a dual-core athlon64x2 3800+, and an athlon64-3000+, and (to my surprise) results are comparable on all three.
 
I tried three different CPUs -- a dual Opteron 240, a dual-core athlon64x2 3800+, and an athlon64-3000+, and (to my surprise) results are comparable on all three.
  +
  +
File size is of course a function of audio and video bitrates. While there may be minor differences in resulting file sizes for identical bitrates (not tested), the real question at that point is quality (also not tested).

Revision as of 22:58, 30 March 2006

TV Recording applications

Other frame grabbers

Common configuration and control commands

1. v4l2ucp -- universal control panel for v4l2 (available for Debian from Marillat)

2. Command-line control the TV card (v4lctl is a part of the xawtv package)

  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 list
  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 bright "60%"
  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 contrast "55%"

3. Capture the stream

  • streamer (part of the xawtv package):
Usage:
streamer -i 1 -c /dev/video0 -s 320x240 -q -j 80 -f jpeg -n ntsc -b 24 -o /var/www/webcam.jpeg
streamer -i 1 -c /dev/video0 -s 320x240 -q -j 80 -f jpeg -n ntsc -b 24 -o /dev/stdout |uuencode thief.jpeg|sendmail alarm@foo.com
  • videodog:
Usage:
videodog -x 640 -y 480 -w 3 -b 1 -c 65535 -m PAL -q -d /dev/video0 -j -f /var/www/webcam.jpg
This useful tool supports continuously moving (ftp or scp - ssh copy) of jpeg output to remote server. Also allows put in additional text (date time, location), rotating of image.
Usage:
webcam /etc/webcamrc
See webcams for model and driver details

Compression formats

Live x264 capture comparison

The x264 encoder is now of such a high quality that it is possible to compress live tv on the fly with good results. So far transcode is the only solution that delivers on all counts: good audio/video synchronization, small file size, efficient encoding (full size and high quality without dropped frames), and a resulting file that streams with VLC. These results, however, may vary locally; the following is a status report from late March 2006 on a Debian amd64 sid with Marillat's multimedia packages.


application a/v sync efficiency streaming
ffmpeg middling good yes
mencoder great poor no
transcode good great yes


Encoding commands used

ffmpeg -threads 2 -vd /dev/video$DEV -r 29.97 -b 800 -s 640x480 -vcodec h264 -qmax 51 \
-me epzs -deinterlace -g 300 -async 1 -ac 2 -acodec mp3 -ab 64 -ar 32000 \
-ad /dev/dsp$DEV -t $TIM -f avi -y $DIR/$FIL.avi
mencoder -tv driver=v4l2:device=/dev/video$DEV:fps=30000/1001:chanlist=us-bcast:\
audiorate=32000:adevice=/dev/dsp$DEV:input=0:amode=1:normid=4:width=512:height=384 \
-ovc x264 -x264encopts threads=2:bitrate=500:subq=2:me=2:frameref=4:8x8dct \
-oac mp3lame -lameopts cbr:br=96 -endpos $TIM -o $DIR/$FIL.avi tv:// > /dev/null
transcode -x v4l2=resync_margin=1:resync_interval=250,v4l2 -M 2 \
-i /dev/video$DEV -p /dev/dsp$DEV -y ffmpeg -F h264 -c 00:$TIM \
-g 640x480 -f 29.970,4 -u 1024,2 -w 800 -b 128 -Q 5 -e 32000,16,2 \
--lame_preset medium -o $DIR/$FIL.avi

Notes

  • ffmpeg
    • a/v sync drifts a bit -- not reliable
    • encoding efficiency is high, but frames are dropped silently
  • transcode
    • after adding the resync parameters, the sync problem, previously severe, appears to be solved!
    • does a swell job keeping up with frames -- full-size capture with no drops -- though I'm still wondering if it might be dropping frames silently
  • mencoder
    • creates files that don't stream correctly -- we've not got to the bottom of this
    • encoding efficiency is somewhat below ffmpeg and transcode -- cannot capture to full 640x480 size without dropping frames

I tried three different CPUs -- a dual Opteron 240, a dual-core athlon64x2 3800+, and an athlon64-3000+, and (to my surprise) results are comparable on all three.

File size is of course a function of audio and video bitrates. While there may be minor differences in resulting file sizes for identical bitrates (not tested), the real question at that point is quality (also not tested).