On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:44:15PM +0100, Holger Waechtler wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I'd like to apply your patch, but don't you want to create a dynamic > dependency rule (like in DVB/apps/szap/Makefile) which calls gcc -M to > create and update dependencies? This is simpler and more bulletproof. That's no problem, and I will do that. I just thought, it was somewhat intentional by the man, who started to code the dependencies statically. --- How do you think, I created those dependencies? ;-) BTW: Is it acceptable to support gcc only here (as it is kernel code). Because, if this was the case, I can create the dependencies without an extra run of gcc. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2517 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
Attachment:
pgp00021.pgp
Description: PGP signature