[linux-dvb] Re: first version of budget-ci implementation

[Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>]

On Tuesday 06 April 2004 18:47, Jesper Sörensen wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> >>Oh dear, this is the sort of thing that Robert was seeing with the
> >> Zetacam.
>
> Oh dear in fact. I thought that "Valid DVB CAM detected" meant that
> there was hope for this CAM. If this one is broken too, is there any
> chance a new Conax CAM would work or are all Conax CAMs doomed too?

I really can't say; with the ZetaCAM, Robert was able to do the equivalent of 
all the same stuff, but it failed in the link initialisation as well. 

> I'm sorry I can't test this with Windows (it's not installed on that
> machine). If nothing else works I'll try installing Windows or testing
> this in another machine, but I can't do that until this weekend at the
> earliest...

If you're willing to give it a go under windows thats great! No problems about 
having to wait a few days.

> dvb_ca_en50221_link_init
> dvb_ca_en50221_wait_if_status
> STATUS: 43

Er, weird! That status is printed just after the comms interface is reset. And 
its showing both a READ and a WRITE transfer error.... no data has been 
transferred at that point...

> dvb_ca_en50221_wait_if_status succeeded timeout:0
> dvb_ca_en50221_wait_if_status
> STATUS: 43
> dvb_ca_en50221_wait_if_status failed timeout:101
> dvb_ca_en50221_read_data
> dvb_ca: DVB CAM link initialisation failed :(
>
> I'm willing to continue testing as long as you're willing to send
> patches. :-) I know C but I have no experience with this low level stuff
> so I'm not sure how much I can help.

Thanks, I'll try and think of something else to test...


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.