[linux-dvb] Can the auto symbol rate patch for mt312 be merged?

To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Subject: [linux-dvb] Can the auto symbol rate patch for mt312 be merged?
From: Roberto Ragusa <mail@robertoragusa.it>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:31:02 +0200
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=help>
List-id: linux-dvb <linux-dvb.mail>
List-owner: <mailto:listmaster@convergence.de>
List-post: <mailto:linux-dvb@linuxtv.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-dvb>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-dvb>
Sender: linux-dvb-bounce@linuxtv.org

Hi,

I've not received any comments about my blindscan 0.2 and related patches
(message sent on 2004-08-13) and people are contacting me directly asking
about how to the patch the CVS to support blindscan.

Can we finally take a decision on the inclusion of the auto symbol rate
patch for mt312 into CVS?
Are the API extensions still controversial or are they now acceptable?

Regards.
-- 
   Roberto Ragusa    mail at robertoragusa.it

Follow-Ups:
- [linux-dvb] Re: Can the auto symbol rate patch for mt312 be merged?
  - From: Holger Waechtler <holger@qanu.de>

Prev by Date: [linux-dvb] video data stream broken
Next by Date: [linux-dvb] Re: Budget card recommendations?
Previous by thread: [linux-dvb] video data stream broken
Next by thread: [linux-dvb] Re: Can the auto symbol rate patch for mt312 be merged?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index