[linux-dvb] Re: refactoring

[Michael Hunold <hunold-ml@web.de>]

Hi,

On 07.10.2004 18:47, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> OK, call the ioctl_override()/nontypesafety a temporary solution then.
>
> Can we look into this after the current round of changes? This lot is going to 
> be the worst since we're moving from autodetected(ish) frontends to 
> explicitly requested ones, and removed most of the spaghetti code. I'd like 
> to get the current code out there ASAP so people can start reporting their 
> cards don't work any more because of missing frontends/bugs. I don't fancy 
> having to deal with two refactoring branches at the same time. 
> A move to function pointers can be done later with far less impact since its 
> basically just a fairly easy plumbing change.
Yes, that's fine with me.

CU
Michael.