[vdr] Re: DELT: unexpected behaviour

[Sergei Haller <Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de>]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Matthias Schniedermeyer (MS) wrote:

MS> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:33:07PM +0100, Sergei Haller wrote:
MS> >
MS> > so I supposed that DELT has the same behaviour. Unfortunately not:
MS>
MS> Some people think strange things.

Why strange? That's what the documentations said about DELR. It didn't say
the  same  about  DELT,  so I did never blame on DELT for deleting (or not
deliting) the timer I wanted to delete.

MS> Two subsequend LSTRs are ALLOWED to give 2 completly different results.

yes. but I didn't do two LSTTs.

MS> In short:
MS> Don't change thing only because people don't understand what going on.

I do well understand, what's going on here. I just wanted to point out the
difference in the behaviour of the DELR/DELT commands:

   lstr
   ...
   250-30 27.10 20:10  Z TEST1
   250 31 27.10 20:10  Z TEST2
   delr 30
   250 Recording "30" deleted
   delr 31
   250 Recording "31" deleted

here the recordings "Z TEST1" and "Z TEST2" were deleted.

   lstt
   ...
   250-12 1:1:27:0000:0000:99:99:test test test:
   250 13 1:2:27:0000:0000:99:99:test test test:
   delt 12
   250 Timer "12" deleted
   delt 13
   501 Timer "13" not defined
   delt 12
   250 Timer "12" deleted

here the two timers were deleted.


c ya
        Sergei
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------  -?)
         eMail:       Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de               /\\
-------------------------------------------------------------------- _\_V
Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint.
                -- Mark Twain



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.