[vdr] Re: AC3overDVB patch for vdr-1.3.13?

[Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>]

Michal Dobrzynski wrote:
> 
> Fair enough. But how vanilla is vanilla? Completely unchanged? How
> about non functionality related changes simply for making it fit in a
> distribution (such as Debian)? I guess that would only include how and
> where files are arranged and nothing in the core of VDR.
> 
> I ask because if superficial changes like that were still OK I'd
> consider having 2 versions of VDR installed. A tweaked version and an
> almost vanilla version for the purpose of verifying whether the problem
> was with VDR or some of the modifications.

Changes to the directories etc. where files are put shouldn't matter.
In the end it comes down to whether or not a problem can be reproduced
on my version of VDR ;-)

Klaus

> Regards,
> Michal Dobrzynski
> 
> On 19/10/2004, at 10:15 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> 
> > Since I have only very little time to spend on VDR, I can only
> > look into problems that I can reproduce with plain vanilla VDR.
> > No patches, no plugins. If you have problems with patches/plugins,
> > I'm afraid I can't help (I'd really like to, but I just don't have
> > the time).
> >
> > Klaus