[linux-dvb] [ANNOUNCE] CA_ZAP
Manu Abraham
manu at kromtek.com
Thu Jun 23 16:59:31 CEST 2005
Allan Stirling wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>
>> Allan Stirling wrote:
>>
>>> Manu Abraham wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Allan Stirling wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pmt_pid: 0 tid: 2 service_id: 4703
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pmt_pid should not be 0, PID 0 will parse the PAT..
>>>>
>>>> Try whether you can see the service_id in the PAT with dvbsnoop ..
>>>>
>>> dvbsnoop -demux /dev/dvb3.demux0 -frontend /dev/dvb3.frontend0 -n 1 0x00
>>> dvbsnoop V1.3.77 -- http://dvbsnoop.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> SECT-Packet: 00000001 PID: 0 (0x0000), Length: 48 (0x0030)
>>> Time received: Thu 2005-06-23 14:16:37.604
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 0000: 00 b0 2d 07 eb df 00 00 00 00 e0 10 12 61 e1 00
>>> ..-..........a..
>>> 0010: 13 f0 e1 02 13 f1 e1 0d 13 f2 e1 0c 14 56 e1 06
>>> .............V..
>>> 0020: 15 82 e1 09 16 aa e1 0a 16 ac e1 0b b1 0f b9 28
>>> ...............(
>>>
>>> PID: 0 (0x0000) [= assigned for: ISO 13818-1 Program Association
>>> Table (PAT)]
>>> Guess table from table id...
>>> PAT-decoding....
>>> Table_ID: 0 (0x00) [= Program Association Table (PAT)]
>>> section_syntax_indicator: 1 (0x01)
>>> (fixed): 0 (0x00)
>>> reserved_1: 3 (0x03)
>>> Section_length: 45 (0x002d)
>>> Transport_Stream_ID: 2027 (0x07eb)
>>> reserved_2: 3 (0x03)
>>> Version_number: 15 (0x0f)
>>> current_next_indicator: 1 (0x01) [= valid now]
>>> Section_number: 0 (0x00)
>>> Last_Section_number: 0 (0x00)
>>>
>>> Program_number: 0 (0x0000)
>>> reserved: 7 (0x07)
>>> Network_PID: 16 (0x0010)
>>>
>>> Program_number: 4705 (0x1261)
>>> reserved: 7 (0x07)
>>> Program_map_PID: 256 (0x0100)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> True, you don't have a matching service_id (4703), your channels.conf
>> does not have the correct service_id .. service_id in channels.conf is
>> the same as the Program_number listed here in tthe dvbsnoop output ..
>>
>> Check your channels.conf ..
>
> I'm not completely sure, but I don't think it is. On your channels.conf,
> the PID for video matches the PID for the service_id (?).
> I've just rerun scan again, and the field at the end of the line still
> doesn't change. Is it possible that two fields are being transposed
> somewhere? ie in your setup it doesn't matter since the two are the same?
Do you mean to say that you get a service_id in your channels.conf, but
that program_number is not there in the PAT.
I don't know whether this is possible ..
Andrew, any idea, whether such a situation can arise ? A little bit
confused ..
Manu
More information about the linux-dvb
mailing list