[linux-dvb] [patch] Add support for different tuning algorithms
Andrew de Quincey
adq_dvb at lidskialf.net
Tue Nov 15 20:01:20 CET 2005
On Tuesday 15 Nov 2005 18:40, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> >On Tuesday 15 Nov 2005 18:07, Felix Domke wrote:
> >>Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> >>>Hi, this patch allows frontends (and the user) to select from one of
> >>>several different tuning algorithms. The patch adds four possibilities:
> >>>1) SW - the current dvb-kernel software zigzag code.
> >>>2) HW - the hardware supports zigzagging internally (e.g. DST), so use
> >>>that as it will be faster.
> >>>3) ADAPTIVE - frontend-specific code exploiting frontend-specific
> >>>features. 4) SIMPLE - just set the frontend once and do nothing else
> >>>(e.g. for frequency scanner apps).
> >>Though I didn't test this, i strongly agree that we need this. I don't
> >>think it should be user selectable, though (except for the "SIMPLE"
> >>mode) - either the frontends supports a specific algorithm or not.
> >>Otherwise i fear that user applications start to workaround frontend
> >>driver bugs by selecting another algorithm...
> >Hmm, yeah thats a good point. The userspace API should _really_ just be
> >switchable between "standard" and "scan" mode.
> >What constitutes "normal" mode is then up to the innards of the driver.
> > OK, will update the patch to reflect this.
> But that will apply to the adaptive algo only probably, since there
> cannot be an alternative for the HW_ALGO as it will be implemented in
> Hardware and no point in doing it otherwise. So the only 2 cases left
> would be S/W and and ADAPTIVE, so switching between "standard" and scan"
> mode might not make any difference.. ?
> Or do you mean that the user does not have any option to switch between
> ADAPTIVE and SW .. ?
Yup, the second one. I want the user to be able to switch between "normal" and
"scan" mode. It perhaps isn't useful for the DST, but it would be for most
More information about the linux-dvb