On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:58:10 +0000 Gavin Hamill <gdh at acentral.co.uk> wrote: > Well, more important is the UHF channel number which the 'paedo cites > as 50... so that makes it 704167 kHz by my calculations.. nope I can't > get anything on that freq :/ Yarg, typo - 706167 ... gdh