[linux-dvb] Re: RFC: MPEG encoding and decoding V4L2 API additions
abraham.manu at gmail.com
Tue Feb 20 15:45:50 CET 2007
On 2/20/07, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/20/07, hermann pitton <hermann-pitton at arcor.de> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 18.02.2007, 17:52 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> > > On 2/18/07, hermann pitton <hermann-pitton at arcor.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Manu,
> > > >
> > > > don't post me "private notes" which such citations ( ) I never asked
> > > > for.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Who started the private threads. Anyway, not interested in the answer
> > > also. Since this is just "nonsense"
> > Oh my, there is really a problem.
> > How can you compare a 60K diff of different mantis drivers around,
> > posted out of list cause of its size, with some old IRC quotes with so
> So you really are in a better state to understand the state of the
> mantis driver than the author himself ? (In fact, the hardware vendor
> themslves use the same driver provided by the same OSS mantis driver
> author) So your statement is that the author of the module doesn't
> know what he is doing nor which of his tree is the latest one. Quite
> strange indeed, i don't know how many people will agree with you.
> BTW: where are those "different mantis" drivers ?
> BTW2: i just have one tarball for the mantis driver
> Analyze yourself, with the statements what you made earlier. OT
> question, why are such much interested/jumpy in a driver that is under
> development which is no way related to you ... ?
> If you had such a piece of hardware at least, i could understand that,
> but people who have the hardware are yet to make statements/claims
> that which you made. Anyway don't understand why you had to take the
> herculean task of comparing 60k diffs.
> Very hard to understand you. As i said on the ML. the latest tree is
> there as a tarball on kromtek.com (Someone told me on a private note
> to ignore such stupid remarks)
> > many f*, a* and others that it will never pass the filters and I got
> > sick of it after it had good arguments in the beginning?
> > Much better than not to talk at all.
> > I don't know how to settle this easy, but I'm not against people
> > developing drivers under NDAs for getting some income and can understand
> > that it is not convenient after lots of work to have the v4l maintainer
> > suddenly around.
> Are you okay, in all senses ?
> So, are you making payments to the people who are working on the
> drivers ? If you meant myself, i do work on all these drivers in my
> private free time.
> So, i am reiterating what you said earlier, "before stating anything
> try to understand what is correct."
someone told me .. "envy is more common than hemoroids"
Replying to my own post,
Maybe i should feel flattered at this point, looking at your posts/mails.
More information about the linux-dvb