[linux-dvb] OT: Dual/BSD Licensing (was: Re: Multiproto API/Driver Update)
freebeer.bouwsma at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 21:04:56 CEST 2008
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> I doubt that *BSD would allow GPL'd .c-files into their kernel trees.
Ha. Found one. Present (NetBSD) OS does not give me access
to my up-to-date source repositories, so I don't know if it's
obsolete now, and I can't grep through DragonFly-, Open-,
and other derivates along the BSD family tree.
There are, however, numerous dual GPL/BSD license files to
be found, some with different wordings.
is an example of a file has plenty of Linuxisms intact.
has a BSD license atop, and at the end, a Linux kernel module
is quite old -- while I do have later source on this disk,
my present kernel limits me to the 16 partitions I've defined
from the 30-odd I can find with Linux (experimental code to
use BSD disklabels or GPT has not been as successful as I
would like); this isn't relevant, is it? Anyway... I'll
quote from this file:
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_random.c,v 184.108.40.206 2002/09/17 17:11:57 sam Exp $
* Version 0.95, last modified 18-Oct-95
* Copyright Theodore Ts'o, 1994, 1995. All rights reserved.
* ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of
* the GNU Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL are
* required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions. (This clause is
* necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and
* the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.)
Now we take a look at an interesting file:
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/dgb/dgm.c,v 220.127.116.11 2001/10/07 09:02:25 brian Exp $
* There was a copyright confusion: I thought that having read the
* GLPed drivers makes me mentally contaminated but in fact it does
* not. Since the Linux driver by Troy De Jongh <troyd at digibd.com> or
* <troyd at skypoint.com> was used only to learn the Digi's interface,
* I've returned this driver to a BSD-style license. I tried to contact
* all the contributors and those who replied agreed with license
* change. If you did any contribution when the driver was GPLed and do
* not agree with the BSD-style re-licensing please contact me.
``Mentally contaminated''. Hmmm. Need to design a suitable
icon for that, and print up biohazard-like warning signs to
wear on my jacket. Anyway, that's an example of the sort of
flame wars that you can find elsewhere.
Now, a bit futher along, again from my old source tree,
* dgb.c $FreeBSD: src/sys/gnu/i386/isa/dgb.c,v 18.104.22.168 2001/02/26 04:23:09 jlemon Exp $
* Digiboard driver.
* Stage 1. "Better than nothing".
* Stage 2. "Gee, it works!".
* Based on sio driver by Bruce Evans and on Linux driver by Troy
* De Jongh <troyd at digibd.com> or <troyd at skypoint.com>
* which is under GNU General Public License version 2 so this driver
* is forced to be under GPL 2 too.
But then, this is under FreeBSD's sys/gnu subdirectory,
where optional non-BSD-licensed files would be found.
Of course, the actual basics of the kernel (memory manglement
and what not) will not be exclusively GPL -- only those
optional components for convenience.
I hope these licenses help any authors who are
considering whether a dual-license for their code
is worthy. This is all based on `grep', not on an
intimate knowledge of how these source files interface
with the kernel.
> P.S. Interesting place you keep your sources...
Not enough mountpoints, too many external drives with
too many partitions, never enough consistency to add a
fixed mountpoint for anything that I might occasionally
mount, so I just mount it on whatever looks available,
then it kinda gets hardcoded differently into different
scripts on different OSen, and anyway, I usually end up
rearranging or migrating stuff sooner rather than later.
med venlig hilsen,
More information about the linux-dvb