[vdr] cRemux single threaded?

[Udo Richter]

Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Well, we could introduce
>>
>>   cRemux::SetTimeouts(int PutTimeout, int GetTimeout) { 
>> resultBuffer->SetTimeouts(PutTimeout, GetTimeout); }
>>
>> Klaus
> 
> Haven't gotten any response on this suggestion so far.
> Would this solve your problem?

Oh, sorry.
Yes, of course, this would work. My current workaround is to gain access 
using dirty tricks, so this is welcome. Access to Available() may be 
useful too. Or, for a bigger rewrite, what about making class cRemux : 
public cRingBufferLinear?

Cheers,

Udo