[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.3.49
zzam at gentoo.org
Sun Apr 30 11:18:03 CEST 2006
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:06, Jörg Wendel wrote:
> On Sonntag 30 April 2006 10:50, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > Darren Salt wrote:
> > > I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >> Apparently PIC is only available on special processors, especially
> > >> *not* Intel, [...]
> > >
> > > False. You need -fPIC for libraries on ARM, which means that you need
> > > it on XScale - and that's an Intel processor...
> > I looked up the -fPIC option in "Using and Porting GNU CC",
> > version 2.95, where it says on page 110:
> > "This option makes a difference on the m68k, m88k, and the Sparc."
> > Well, that manual is a little old, so maybe that information is
> > outdated...
> > Klaus
> the same hint is still included in the manpage of "gcc (GCC) 4.0.2"
> If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent
> code, suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the
> size of the global offset table. This option makes a difference
> on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC.
> Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore
> works only on certain machines.
> i my idea is likewise that it doesn't care on Intel systems.
PIC does(!) make a change on Intel systems, too.
PIC = Position Independant Code
That means the compiler will not assamble absolute jumps but create a table
with addresses to use indirect address lookup.
For a better description have a look at:
More information about the vdr