[vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

Jörn Reder joern at zyn.de
Sun Aug 20 23:05:05 CEST 2006


Udo Richter wrote:

> The primary device should be available for live viewing as long as 
> possible. Even if I do a recording, the primary device should be 
> available for channel switching, and not requiring transfer mode. 
> Recording is the job of the budget card.

Hmm, it's not that easy because it ignores the original intention of 
this thread. It makes no sense that a CAM budget card is always used to
record a free channel, which makes it impossible to view and/or record 
encrypted channels at the same time. A CAM is a valuable resource, 
wasting it is obviously a bad idea.

If it's really of general interest to reserve a FF card as long as 
possible (it looks this feature was requested to workaround very 
specific hardware problems), I'd vote for a new VDR preference setting 
to control the device priority, instead of any hardcoded recipe.

Regards,

Joern

-- 
Joern Reder
supporting:   http://www.zyn.de/
unbelievable: http://www.exit1.org/
CPAN:         http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/by-authors/id/J/JR/JRED
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20060820/c76da753/attachment.pgp


More information about the vdr mailing list