[vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and
blocks it unnecessarily
Jörn Reder
joern at zyn.de
Sun Aug 20 23:05:05 CEST 2006
Udo Richter wrote:
> The primary device should be available for live viewing as long as
> possible. Even if I do a recording, the primary device should be
> available for channel switching, and not requiring transfer mode.
> Recording is the job of the budget card.
Hmm, it's not that easy because it ignores the original intention of
this thread. It makes no sense that a CAM budget card is always used to
record a free channel, which makes it impossible to view and/or record
encrypted channels at the same time. A CAM is a valuable resource,
wasting it is obviously a bad idea.
If it's really of general interest to reserve a FF card as long as
possible (it looks this feature was requested to workaround very
specific hardware problems), I'd vote for a new VDR preference setting
to control the device priority, instead of any hardcoded recipe.
Regards,
Joern
--
Joern Reder
supporting: http://www.zyn.de/
unbelievable: http://www.exit1.org/
CPAN: http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/by-authors/id/J/JR/JRED
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20060820/c76da753/attachment.pgp
More information about the vdr
mailing list