[vdr] tunerlock with alternate primary device
udo_richter at gmx.de
Fri Mar 31 14:15:34 CEST 2006
> If I define PrimaryDVB = 2 in setup.conf and enable WAIT_FOR_TUNER_LOCK, it
> seems VDR checks for primary device = 1 first. Should VDR not start with the
> primary device defined by the setup.conf first?
> vdr:  ERROR: device 1 has no lock, can't attach receiver!
Sure that this is the same numbering?
The 'has no lock' error reports the CardIndex, while PrimaryDVB is a
device index. I'm not sure, but I think that using -D may change the
ordering for device index, but not CardIndex.
More information about the vdr