[vdr] [RFC] Shutdown rewrite for 1.5.x
udo_richter at gmx.de
Wed Jan 24 18:49:10 CET 2007
Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:19:57PM +0100, Udo Richter wrote:
>> Since the shutdown script runs in the background, the stdin could
>> probably be closed. After all, VDR should continue to 'own' stdin, and
>> running in the background would probably cause a conflict. However,
>> running the script with a closed file handle may cause other side effects.
> I can't think of any side effect. The shutdown script is not supposed
> to be interactive, and system tools generally do not read stdin.
Well, strange things happen. I've had such a side effect on my runvdr
extreme with a closed stdout, see here: (German)
In this case, printf on kanotix complained heavily on a closed stdout,
and the only workaround was to replace >&- with the traditional >/dev/null.
> Are you planning to maintain the 1.4 branch of the patch? If yes
> (and I hope so), can plugins use some #ifdef to see if
> Shutdown.IsUserInactive() is available?
For now I'll maintain it, currently the differences are only minor.
Adding some #ifdef detection is a good idea, I'll add that for the next
More information about the vdr