[vdr] Safer diseqc setup ? Like in kaffeine ?
rnissl at gmx.de
Sun Jan 28 22:23:45 CET 2007
Gregoire Favre wrote:
>> I've had a look at the source code today. kaffeine "uses" a VDR
>> diseqc.conf like this one:
>> S19.2E 11700 V 9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
>> S19.2E 99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
>> S19.2E 11700 H 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
>> S19.2E 99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T
>> S13.0E 11700 V 9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
>> S13.0E 99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
>> S13.0E 11700 H 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
>> S13.0E 99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T
>> S28.2E 11700 V 9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F8] W15 A W15 t
>> S28.2E 99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F9] W15 A W15 T
>> S28.2E 11700 H 9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FA] W15 A W15 t
>> S28.2E 99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FB] W15 A W15 T
> It's one of my try, but it don't work sowell here. So I guess it's not
> totally what kaffeine does.
I'm sorry, this IS what the code does:
Just have a look at these functions:
> I don't understand the difference betweem a diseqc and a multiswitch.
I don't think that there is any difference concerning switching. The
only difference I can think of is, that DiSEqC 1.0 allows you to select
a port/band among 16 while the "old" signalling supports only 8 ports/bands.
> I think I will go off VDR and look how to use mastetimer similar tool
> under it, it's way too hard to setup diseqc under vdr.
> Thank for all your help, unfortunately, I give up...
Here you'll find further reading:
>> I also had a closer look into the specification and into the
>> implementation guide. There is only one mandatory command for DiSEqC
>> 1.0: the above used 0x38.
> Well, good to know :-)
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl
mailto:rnissl at gmx.de
More information about the vdr