[vdr] vdr 1.7.4 memory leak?
Paul Menzel
paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Apr 16 18:50:26 CEST 2009
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2009, 16:30 +0200 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
> On 04/12/09 16:20, martinez at embl.de wrote:
> > I have setup an HTPC based on oxine + vdr
> > It has 2gigs of RAM and another 2gigs of Swap space
> > Upon booting it uses about 300megs of RAM.
> >
> > 5 hours later (running vdr all this time)
> > I notice most of the ram is in use.
> >
> > Is this a known memory leak or a design feature?
>
> Neither one ;-)
>
> > If a known memory leak is there a patch for it or we need to wait for 1.7.5?
>
> I have released version 1.7.5 earlier today.
> Please test if it happens with this one, too.
>
> > top - 16:15:00 up 45 min, 2 users, load average: 1.06, 1.34, 1.45
> > Tasks: 113 total, 1 running, 112 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> > Cpu(s): 21.2%us, 2.5%sy, 0.2%ni, 76.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> > Mem: 1811916k total, 1765156k used, 46760k free, 15640k buffers
> > Swap: 2096472k total, 4972k used, 2091500k free, 1449112k cached
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> > 6486 root 20 0 203m 59m 19m S 16 3.4 5:18.98 oxine
> > 6699 root 20 0 172m 11m 5680 S 14 0.7 5:06.00 vdr
> > 6133 root 20 0 94144 50m 32m S 9 2.9 1:21.67 Xorg
> > 6721 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 2 0.0 0:37.73 cx88[0] dvb
> > 6330 root 20 0 63672 2324 1752 S 1 0.1 0:16.44 CCcam.x86
> > 6702 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 1 0.0 0:12.24 kdvb-ad-0-fe-0
> > 1 root 20 0 3056 1900 576 S 0 0.1 0:01.60 init
>
> I dont' see a problem here.
>
> Can you post the same info when the problem actually happens?
Maybe you can sort it by memory usage (shift + m).
Thanks,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20090416/ec63e019/attachment.pgp
More information about the vdr
mailing list