[vdr] auto shutdown (-s) question

Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sun Feb 8 19:20:43 CET 2009


On Sunday 08 February 2009, Udo Richter wrote:
> On 08.02.2009 10:19, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 February 2009, Udo Richter wrote:
> >> Unfortunately it's not that easy. Currently, VDR backgrounds the call to
> >> the shutdown script, and detaches the shutdown script from the VDR
> >> process. Only because of that, the script can 'survive' the kill of VDR,
> >
> > Why is that even necessary?  Shutdown scripts could selectively
> > background+detach things that need to survive killing of VDR and the
> > script themselves, if any.
>
> Detaching as a script isn't that easy, the reason for these ugly echo  
> "..." | at now workarounds.

There are other alternatives to choose from if one for some reason can't 
stomach the "at" approach.

> >> and only because of that the script can display messages via SVDRP.
> >
> > Hmm, why wouldn't a non-background, non-detached script called by VDR be
> > able to do that?
>
> The main VDR thread would have to wait for the return, and SVDRP won't
> be handled until then. SVDRP connections from the script would timeout.
> You can see that if you use SVDRP commands from commands.conf without
> explicitly backgrounding.

That sounds like a bug to me, irrespective of this discussion.

> The question for VDR is: If we
> don't shut down, when should VDR check again, or how does VDR know that
> the background job is done?

Why would VDR check or care in the first place?

> An error level return is quite limited here.

Sure, but quite a bit better than what's currently sanely doable.



More information about the vdr mailing list