[vdr] mdadm software raid5 arrays?
jori.hamalainen at teliasonera.com
jori.hamalainen at teliasonera.com
Wed Nov 11 09:01:18 CET 2009
> Ok.. short comparison, using a single disk as baseline.
Good chart, perhaps you should also mention the capacity. With this I
mean what happens.
1 disk = 1TB for simplicity.
>using 2 disks
>raid0: (striping)
> ++ double read throughput,
> ++ double write throughput,
> -- half the reliability (read: only use with good backup!)
Capacity: 2TB
>raid1: (mirroring)
> ++ double read throughput.
> o same write throughput
> ++ double the reliability
Capacity: 1TB
>using 3 disks:
>raid0: striping
> +++ tripple read performance
> +++ tripple write performance
> --- third of reliability
Capacity: 3TB
>raid1: mirroring
> +++ tripple read performance
> o same write throughput
> +++ tripple reliability
Capacity: 1TB
>raid5: (distributed parity)
> +++ tripple read performance
> - lower write performance (not due to the second write but due
> to the necessary reads)
> + sustains failure of any one drive in the set
Capacity: 2TB
>using 4 disks:
>raid1+0:
> ++++ four times the read performance
> ++ double write performance
> ++ double reliability
Capacity: 2TB
Raid5:
> +++ four times the read performance
> - lower write performance (not due to the second write but due
> to the necessary reads)
> + sustains failure of any one drive in the set
Capacity: 3TB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5993 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20091111/79666a61/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the vdr
mailing list