[vdr] [PATCH] Makefile: pass `LDFLAGS` to compiler
ml at websitec.de
Mon Dec 13 23:12:38 CET 2010
> Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 11:29 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
>> Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 00:29 +0100 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
>> > > Am Samstag, den 25.09.2010, 13:15 +0200 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
>> > > […]
>> > >>  http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
>> > > Should `LDFLAGS` also be passed to the compiler when building the
>> > > plugins?
>> > We have this fixed global on Gentoo for all plugins.
>> > All plugin Makefile's are sed'ed/patched to use the LDFLAGS.
>> Sorry, I do not know Gentoo’s build system. I found the patch for VDR
>>  and the ebuild file .
>> I was wondering why skincurses had no patch applied or change regarding
>> `LDFLAGS`  and for example vdr-burn  has a separate patch. Then I
>> found `vdr-plugin.eclass`  where the replacement is done using `sed`.
>> > > I made a patch from your message which does not include any changes to
>> > > the plugins.
>> > I dont know, what distri you use,
>> I am using the OpenEmbedded framework .
>> > one way would be to fix this in the make.global ( used up from
>> > vdr-1.7.(not shure yet)) and inherit this in the plugin Makefile.
>> > Should be standard in the vdr-1.7.x adapted plugin Makefiles
>> That is what my patch is for. I will send an updated patch.
> One question left. Why does not `LDFLAGS` need to be passed in the
> implicit rules?
> ### Implicit rules:
> %.o: %.c
> $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -c $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) $<
In this part will only create/compiled the object files, $(OBJS),
files with .o extension.
It is not needed to link here against LDFLAGS,
Linked will only the final lib
Joerg Bornkessel <hd_brummy at gentoo.org>
More information about the vdr