[vdr] Recordings Numbering
steffenbpunkt at googlemail.com
Wed Nov 10 20:30:23 CET 2010
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:09:46 +0100
Andreas Brachold <ml08 at deltab.de> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler:
> > ACK. Unique IDs over the lifetime of an SVDRP connection solve the
> > actual problem. Everything beyond get's too complicated.
> Here I would agree with you.
> > Guess a touch /video/.update would result in new IDs for all
> > recordings. So one must be aware that if an ID is no longer
> > available, the corresponding item has not necessarily been deleted.
> Why ? This is not even necessary !
> Missing recordings should simple remove from list (LSTR) and new
> recordings should added at end of list.
> Anything else would not work with existing svdrp programs.
> But right now VDR can use only one connection at same time.
> From my point of view (xxv as svdrp client), I would not block the
> connection permanent. And I do not would to reread every time any
So the problem is not the recording numbering (for what ?) , but the
svdrp limitation to one connection.
More information about the vdr