[vdr] Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

syrius.ml at no-log.org syrius.ml at no-log.org
Thu Mar 1 19:28:01 CET 2012


Paul Menzel <paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero:
>> On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote:
>> >
>> > I just want to throw in, that there are several programs already using a
>> > client/server approach (MythTV [1], Tvheadend [2], …) and we should not
>> > reinvent the wheel when designing the new implementation. 
>> 
>> I'd like to oppose headline and last statement.
>> 
>> "We" can do better, so let's go ahead :)
>
> It looks like my message was not clear enough. I meant we should look at
> what other projects implemented and tried and take the good ideas and
> use those. So of course the result will probably be better.
>
> But cooperation like on using already existing protocols would be a big
> advantage, because in this way already existing clients or servers can
> be used to or tested against.

Do you also imply the use of things like git/github ?

-- 



More information about the vdr mailing list