Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[linux-dvb] Re: Frontend experimental patch v1



> i have tested this last week, only one clr_bit is needed after tuning. So,
> if you "FE_RESET" after tuning in the core frontend stuff with FE_POLL (if
> i have understand this correct), there is no need for doing this after
> setting the symbolrate.
>
> Or, possilbe the better way, we donīt do a "RESET" in the core stuff for
> the ves1x93 and let the clr_bit stay as is in the symbolrate routine. This
> is maybe better, because the tuxbox project share the ves1x93 driver with
> "us"; the dbox2 uses the same demod. So the frontend driver have a chance
> to differ between ves1893 who need the "reset" and the ves1993 who will
> irritate by this.
>
> Maybe Andreas Oberritter could say anything about this...

Weird, I see what you mean; the code doesn't do the clr_bit() if its a 
ves1993... although it _will_ have been having it done previously because of 
the old call to FE_RESET.

Why then would there need to be multiple clr_bit() calls for the ves1893 then 
I wonder if only one is really needed?


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index