[linux-dvb] Re: Full featured card summary

[Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>]

On Saturday 13 March 2004 15:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > OK, this is getting far too confusing. Need to summarise this:
> >
> > We're trying two types of DVB-S-fullfeatured cards: the 1.3 and the 1.6
> >
> > The 1.3 works fine with the alps_bsrv2(101) driver
> > The 1.3 fails with the ves1x93(110) (polarisation switching)
> > The 1.3 fails with the ves1x93(cvs) (polarisation switching)
> >
> > I don't see how the 1.6 can be working with either as it is using a
> > completely different frontend.
> >
> > Klaus, you reported that the 1.3 fails completely for you with
> > ves1x93(cvs), and that the suggestion by Andreas doesn't help with the
> > polarization problem. That sounds weird 'cos Helmut says ves1x93(cvs)
> > only has the polarization problem, not that it fails totally. Can you try
> > Oliver's suggestion of resetting everything and retry ves1x93(cvs)?
> >
> > Is the above correct?
>
> Not quite.
>
> When I use the driver from yesterday's CVS it works a bit,
> but switching polarizations doesn't always work.
>
> With
>
>   0x80, 0x00, 0x31, 0xb0, 0x14, 0x00, 0xDC, 0x20,
>
> it is the same as before, and with
>
>   0x80, 0x00, 0x21, 0xb0, 0x14, 0x00, 0xDC, 0x00,

OK, that change was done by Andreas Share, and it worked on his system. I 
checked it into CVS yesterday, but obviously _after_ you checked your tree 
out, which explains the confusion.

However, it doesn't work for you though.

Andreas, what exactly does that change do? There are two bits being modified 
there.


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.