[linux-dvb] Re: [rfc/patch] pll handling and cx22702 update

[Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>]

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 08:20:29PM +0000, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> Hi, how about the attached example (probably won't compile BTW)
> 
> This should let simple tuners be represented as simply as Gerd had them, but 
> also allow more flexibility to represent pretty much anything.
> 
> It reinstates the more complex rules for the dtt7579/dtt759x - they both 
> require settings to be changed post-tuning and one requires a sleep to let 
> the tuner settle.
> 
> Its also flexible enough for the more extreme examples - e.g. the TUA6120 that 
> Andreas pointed out would be implemented by supplying a custom Set() 
> function, which used the "int device" field to encode the exact register to 
> write to.

Besides the fact that it won't compile (no alloca() in kernel etc.)
it looks OK.

Johannes