[vdr] Re: broken threads

[Usenet-372203@zocki.toppoint.de (Rainer Zocholl)]

Andreas.Portz@gmx.de(Andreas Portz)  04.03.02 10:31

Once upon a time Andreas Portz shaped the electrons to say...

>Rainer Zocholl wrote:

>> "me" can see the reference.

>/me can not see any reference, also with strg-U in Netscape. Same
>problem with about 1/3 up to 1/2 of all replies.


>> i see that:
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Message-ID : 000001c1c2e5$a99247c0$b40ea9d9@simon
>> Bezugs-ID  : 9341359515.20020303002154@gmx.net, ...
>>

>Bezugs-ID is the same like "In-Reply-To:<9341359515.20020303002154@gmx.net>" 
>in my Netscape headers. 
>I can see this in Simons mail, too. 
>But the reference 
>"References: <000001c1c2e5$a99247c0$b40ea9d9@simon>" 
>(this was the Ref from my first answer) is missing .

So it is a Problem of _your_ mail reader not taking "In-Reply-To"
in account for threading... ;-)


AFAIK: "references" lists in eMails often causes problem in MTA:
RfC limits the length of header lines (256 chars, not time to look
it aup, but it is very limited) but reference lists can become real
long. What does the good MTA do? Jepp, it'll cut it to a legal length.. ;-(