[vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
From: Régis Bossut <rbossut@partner.auchan.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:06:02 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
Organization: Auchan International Technology
References: <8O9BFLitNGB@zocki.toppoint.de>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; fr-FR; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1

Rainer Zocholl writes:

 >...

> Each DVB Cards "eats" at least aprox. 10W, 24h a day.
> 4 Cards are 40W 
> if one is recording+watching 12h a day, 35W*24 are wasted!
>  840Wh 365 days makes 307 kWh/a year wasted(!)
> with (only) 15c/kWh 45,99Euro a Year for nothing! 
> 3,83 Eur each month for nothing...

As far as I know, during cold weathers, if your card is in your leaving 
room, the generated heat is compensated by earnings of central heating.
:-)

/Régis

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: Steffen Koch <Steffen.Koch@sphinx-electronics.de>

References:
- [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: NoSpam-@zocki.toppoint.de (Rainer Zocholl)

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: English VDR translation bug
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index