[vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
From: s.huelswitt@gmx.de (Stefan Huelswitt)
Date: 4 May 2002 09:09:07 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
Newsgroups: local.linux.vdr
Organization: Home, sweet home
References: <20020503110539.GG14096@casper.aon.at> <8O9BFLitNGB@zocki.toppoint.de>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

On 03 May 2002 NoSpam-@zocki.toppoint.de (Rainer Zocholl) wrote:

> There are DVB-API Calls to sent the DVB-boards to "sleep" 
> and "deep sleep".
> We had that issue approx. 4 (?) month ago.

Did you ever tried this calls?

I have done some testing with them (out side vdr) and couln't see
any reduced power consumtion with any mode.

I think the driver developers said some time ago, that this are
dummy calls.

-- 
Stefan Huelswitt
huels@iname.com  | http://home.pages.de/~nathan

References:
- [vdr] What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: Martin Neuditschko <yosuke.tomoe@gmx.net>
- [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: NoSpam-@zocki.toppoint.de (Rainer Zocholl)

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: Siemens dvb-c in germany - channel problems
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: New Premiere Channel Settings 02.05.2002
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index