[vdr] AW: Re: .vdr under Windows

["Oliver Friedrich" <oliver@familie-friedrich.de>]

A good Rambus system would be faster than the same components with DDR. The
memory peeak performance of Rambus ist better...

But i don't think, that it would be produce much better results when viewing
MPEG files, because the acceleration should result of a good video hardware.
The gpu does normaly the zooming and some other parts of the mpeg decoding,
not the cpu of the system.

Or do you want to say, that DDR modules offer more storage capacity at the
same costs? That is true :)
But Rambus becomes cheaper in the last months...

cu,
Oliver

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org]Im Auftrag
von Alessio Sangalli
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2002 10:08
An: vdr@linuxtv.org
Betreff: [vdr] Re: .vdr under Windows


Christian Vogt wrote:

> But anyway: you'll need much cpu speed to watch them. On my 2GHz P4 (only
> DDR, no RAMBUS) it takes about 30% cpu time.

why *only*? DDR are fater that rambus and cost less

bye
as