[vdr] Re: vdr2divx suggestions ? (poll)

["Rene Bartsch" <vdr@bartschnet.de>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Hoffmann" <ma.hoff@t-online.de>
To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:09 PM
Subject: [vdr] vdr2divx suggestions ? (poll)


> Hi,
>
> at the moment i consider writing a complete new version (2.0) of my
vdr2divx
> scripts, maybe in c++.
> It should contain all the features and automatism the 1.6.0 pre1 (to be
more
> precisely the 1.6.0 pre2 , which wasn't released yet) has.
>
> However it should be configurable via 2divx.conf and act fully
automatically,
> just as current vdr2divx does. But beside this one should be able to
override
> these setting via commandline or via JobQ temporarily (e.g. for one
encoding)
> - this was suggested long ago, but with current implementation this is
rather
> hard to do... :-( So major restructuring is needed, that's why i think of
a
> complete re-write from scratch...
>
> So what's the features of current version ?
> see http://www.linuxtv.org/mailinglists/vdr/2002/10-2002/msg00139.html
> or search the VDR mail archives for 2divx announcements ;-)
>
> And what's the "new" features of the currently unreleased 1.6.0pre2 ?
> +It's able to copy the summary.txt to a name_of_the_destination_avi.txt
file
> to preserve the movie information (maybe useful in the future !?)
> +Now a pre conversion check of the source is done, to find stream errors
and
> invoke PVAstrumento to repair them (very experimental at the moment - not
> sure if i keep this)
> +Of course the latest PVAstrumento version is supported (multiple input
file
> support, etc.)
> +no need to use external muxing tools since latest PVAstrumento is able to
> create PS
>
> Okay, as said above the new rewritten version should feature all things
from
> latest 1.6.x version - however if anyone has suggestion for new features
or
> ideas, it would be nice to hear from you !
> I hope you understand since i'm in my planing state it's rather easy to
> implement new features.... So if you ever had ideas for new features, but
> were afraid to ask, it's the right time *NOW* ;-)
>
> btw: Any ideas about a NEW name for vdr2divx ? Once i "invented" the first
> version, divx was the only codec supported. Today i support divx4/5, xvid
and
> libavcodec (ffmpeg) - so vdr2mpeg4 or something might be more convenient ?
> Suggestions also welcome...
>

What about a mencoder-plugin for VDR?

Rene



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.