Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: Experiences with patched VDR 1.2.x (was Re: [PATCH] Old descriptorh



Hallo,

>> If I understand it right then it is only a problem with 2 cards sitting
>> next to each others !
>
>Between my two DVB-s Cards are 4 PCI Slots. And the problem don't change
>when I change the order of my cards. And as I mentioned, another vdr with
>2
>DVB-s, another Motherboard, etc have the same problem.

OK, I did not remember reading that anyone tried moving the cards far
apart. Then it it is not so sure anylonger if it has something to do with
cards sitting next to each other :(


>> >Hmm, I think we should track this error on its root. I'd a look in
>> DVB-CVS
>> >and noticed that in mid-june 2002 there was a change in the mentioned
>> >function. Maybe we should try the older version of that function?
>> 
>> I am not sure which change you mean.
>
>Checkout dvb_frontend.c with tag "1.6.2.31" and with tag "1.6.2.32". Then
>you will see, which changes I mean. 

Unfortunatly I don't have any experience with cvs, except inputting the 2
commands most Sites "recommend" to get the current version. Could you send
the changes to me here ? Or the appropiate commands to get those versions.
Otherwise I will have a look at cvs next time I find some time.

>
>> But I think it is worth trying anything that could work. And as it seems
>> to be a driver bug which vdr triggers with the 1.1.27c patch, or am I
>> wrong here.
>> (hw_sections=1 also goes in that direction.)
>
>Hmm, do you mean the UPT-Error or the "video data stream broken"-Error?
>This
>are two different problems, as I can say, that until now I've no UPT-Error
>with my patched vdr 1.2.5 and DVB from 24.09. with hw_sections=0.  But
>I've
>the "video data stream broken"-Error since vdr 1.0.x. Unfortunately I
>can't
>remember, whether any vdr 1.0.x-version worked without that error.

OK, I did not have the "video data stream broken" yet and from my readings
I thought to understand that if you  use "hw_sections=1" then you get that
error more offen or instead of the UPT !?. And the UPT is then gone.

>
>> That also "points" to the Driver.
>
>It could also be possible, that vdr handle the devices in a wrong way. I
>don't know, but until now we're all unsure, where the problem is located.

OK, keep up the good work :)

Greetings
Christian Jacobsen



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index