[vdr] Re: VDSB solved, need fix...

["C.Y.M" <syphir@syphir.sytes.net>]

Sergei Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Vladimir Shved (VS) wrote:
>
> VS> I think I figured out VDSB problem after playing with multicard setup, I
> VS> think its diseqc switch, at least on my system. Most people have this kind
> VS> of setup:
> VS> 
> VS> (Card#1)-to-(diseqc#1)-to-(lnb#1..#4)-to-(diseqc#2)-to-(Card#2)
> VS> 
> VS> Second is to get rid of diseqc switches, which is not practical, or is it?
> VS> What would be the alternative?
>
>
> why do you need two switches? I think the usual setup is
>
>           ________
>  lnb#1---|        |---- Card#1
>  lnb#2---| diseqc |---- Card#2
>  lnb#3---| switch |---   ...
>  lnb#4---|________|---- Card#n 
>      
Most switches I have seen look more like this:
            ________
  lnb#1---|        |
  lnb#2---| diseqc |---- Card#1
  lnb#3---| switch |
  lnb#4---|________|


Therefore, two switches for two cards.