[vdr] Re: VDSB solved, need fix...

[Vladimir Shved <vshved@logistic-systems.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
> Sergei Haller
...
> VS>
> VS> (Card#1)-to-(diseqc#1)-to-(lnb#1..#4)-to-(diseqc#2)-to-(Card#2)
> VS>
> 
> VS> Second is to get rid of diseqc switches, which is not practical, or is
> it?
> VS> What would be the alternative?
> 
> 
> why do you need two switches? I think the usual setup is
> 
>           ________
>  lnb#1---|        |---- Card#1
>  lnb#2---| diseqc |---- Card#2
>  lnb#3---| switch |---   ...
>  lnb#4---|________|---- Card#n
> 

That looks like 4x4 diseqc switch?, never seen one like this, mostly 4x1
switches are used around here...

	--Vlad