[vdr] Re: VDSB solved, need fix...

[Vladimir Shved <vshved@logistic-systems.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
...
> > Right now VDR handles only diseqc v1.2 commands? Diseqc experts any
> > comments, does it make any sense?
> >
> >
> 
> VDR only requires diseqc v1.2 cmds to function.  I think the problem
> lies with the broken v1.2 backward compatability of diseqc v2.0
> switches.  What would adding v2.0 commands to vdr do?
> 


I'm really not sure but I assume with v2.0 commands would allow to retrieve
diseqc switch info to control individual switches? I mean maybe you have to
go like this with v2.0 commands/protocol from VDR:

VDR: whats your names?
Diseqc1: I'm diseqc A.
Diseqc2: I'm diseqc B.
Diseqc3: I'm diseqc C.
Diseqc4: I'm diseqc D.
VDR: Okay diseqc D, switch to port 1.

Right now VDR just does this:
VDR: okay everyone switch to port 1.
Diseqc1: switched...
Diseqc2: switched...
VDR: I can't hear you and don't care... bye for now.

Does it make sense? V2.0 commands actually allow communicating with diseqc
switch. 

	--Vlad