V4L capturing

From LinuxTVWiki
Revision as of 08:48, 5 April 2006 by Liontooth (talk | contribs) (Compression formats)
Jump to: navigation, search

TV Recording applications

Other frame grabbers

Common configuration and control commands

1. v4l2ucp -- universal control panel for v4l2 (available for Debian from Marillat)

2. Command-line control the TV card (v4lctl is a part of the xawtv package)

  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 list
  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 bright "60%"
  • v4lctl -c /dev/video0 contrast "55%"

3. Capture the stream

  • videodog:
Usage:
videodog -x 640 -y 480 -w 3 -b 1 -c 65535 -m PAL -q -d /dev/video0 -j -f /var/www/webcam.jpg
  • webcam:
This useful tool supports continuously moving (ftp or scp - ssh copy) of jpeg output to remote server. Also allows put in additional text (date time, location), rotating of image.
Usage:
webcam /etc/webcamrc
See webcams for model and driver details

Compression formats

Live x264 capture comparison

The x264 encoder is now of such a high quality that it is possible to compress live tv on the fly with good results. So far transcode is the only solution that delivers on all counts: good audio/video synchronization, small file size, efficient encoding (full size and high quality without dropped frames), and a resulting file that streams with VLC. These results, however, may vary locally; the following is a status report from late March 2006 on a Debian amd64 sid with Marillat's multimedia packages.


application a/v sync efficiency file size streaming
ffmpeg middling good small yes
mencoder great poor smaller no
transcode good great variable yes


Encoding commands used

ffmpeg -threads 2 -vd /dev/video$DEV -r 29.97 -b 800 -s 640x480 -vcodec h264 -qmax 51 \
-me epzs -deinterlace -g 300 -async 1 -ac 2 -acodec mp3 -ab 96 -ar 32000 \
-ad /dev/dsp$DEV -t $TIM -f avi -y $DIR/$FIL.avi
mencoder -tv driver=v4l2:device=/dev/video$DEV:fps=30000/1001:chanlist=us-bcast:\
audiorate=32000:adevice=/dev/dsp$DEV:input=0:amode=1:normid=4:width=512:height=384 \
-ovc x264 -x264encopts threads=2:bitrate=800:subq=2:me=2:frameref=4:8x8dct \
-oac mp3lame -lameopts cbr:br=96 -endpos $TIM -o $DIR/$FIL.avi tv:// > /dev/null
transcode -x v4l2=resync_margin=1:resync_interval=250,v4l2 -M 2 \
-i /dev/video$DEV -p /dev/dsp$DEV -y ffmpeg -F h264 -c 00:$TIM \
-g 640x480 -f 29.970,4 -u 1024,2 -w 800 -b 96 -Q 5 -e 32000,16,2 \
--lame_preset medium -o $DIR/$FIL.avi

Notes

  • ffmpeg
    • a/v sync drifts a bit -- not reliable
    • encoding efficiency is high, but frames are dropped silently
  • mencoder
    • creates files that don't stream correctly in VLC -- we've not got to the bottom of this
    • encoding efficiency is somewhat below ffmpeg and transcode -- cannot capture to full 640x480 size without dropping frames
    • superior to the others in its ability to accept a much fuller set of x264 encoding parameters
  • transcode
    • after adding the resync parameters, the sync problem, previously severe, appears to be solved!
    • does a great job keeping up with frames -- full-size capture with no drops -- though I'm still wondering if it might be dropping frames silently
    • file sizes are highly variable and are poorly controlled by the -w video bitrate switch

File size is in theory a simple function of audio and video bitrates. In practice, ffmpeg and mencoder produce files according to bitrate settings, while transcode is all over the map -- in a small sample of ten, an hour at "-w 500" ranged from a small 377MB all the way up to 684MB, and "-w 800" from 407MB to 754MB. Quality may also vary; currently not assessed.

I tried three different CPUs -- a dual Opteron 240, a dual-core athlon64x2 3800+, and an athlon64-3000+, and (to my surprise) results are comparable on all three.