[vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
From: Tobias Kerner <tobschle@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 19:00:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
References: <010e01c1f29d$31708710$0100a8c0@ulope1>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204

Ulrich Petri wrote:

> I don't know for sure, but if the driver is unloaded, the power to lnb
> is (AFAIK) turned off and also the ARM isn't working, is it? So i think
> it will prolong the lifetime !?

well, the LNB of my parents is powered almost all day long because they 
don't turn off the analog receiver. the lnb is approximatly 10 years 
old. and it still works. so I don't think that's a great problem.

tobi

References:
- [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: "Ulrich Petri" <ulope@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: A way to play NTSC (S)VCDs on PAL - TVS?
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: VDR 1.0.1 crash - video data stream broken
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index