[vdr] Re: Makefile bug in vdr 1.1.20

[Clemens Kirchgatterer <clemens@thf.ath.cx>]

Robert Schiele <robert.schiele@t-online.de> wrote:

> Why not something linke that:
> 
> CFLAGS ?= -O2 -g -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes \
>          -Wimplicit -D__USE_FIXED_PROTOTYPES__
> 
> CFLAGS += -I../include
> 
> If you did it that way, you do not need to redefine implicit rules.

i prefer to have different variables holding different kind of
gcc parameters. but at the end it is up to the maintainer, which way to
go.

> Although, I am not that sure whether all this conditional CFLAGS stuff
> was really a very good idea.  But that might be my personal paranoia.


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.