[vdr] Re: vdr Verhalten bei /video0 /video1 ...

["Bläser, Lars" <LBlaeser@hofheim.de>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emil Naepflein [mailto:Emil.Naepflein@philosys.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:03 AM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] Re: vdr Verhalten bei /video0 /video1 ...
> 
> 
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:40:49 +0100,
> tobias.meyer-janson@sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de (Tobias Meyer-Janson)
> wrote:
> 
> > > tobias.meyer-janson@sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de (Tobias Meyer-Janson)
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > I'm wondering how the behavior of vdr differs 
> concerning /video0 versus
> > > > > /video1.
> > > > 
> > > > No I saw that vdr not only manages different recordings 
> on the disks, it
> > > > splits actual recordings to both disks using sym links.
> > 
> > > If you use vdr for playback/cutting/deletion 
> > 
> > Yes I do, but sometimes I want to rename a recording and do this
> > manually (I don't know any other way). What do I have I to take into
> > account that later playback/cutting/deletion works correctly?
> 
> You only have to rename the primary directory. If you change 
> anything at
> the secondary you have to recreate the symlinks in the primary.

are you shure the recording (dest. of symlink and its directory) will be deleted correctly if the directory name has changed on /video0 ?


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.