Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: VDR-Network-Traffic-Managment
The NICs are rather cheap, that's true, but have you ever seen a inexpensive
GE-switch?
If so, please let me know ;-)
gerhard
>
> Axel,
>
> how about upgrading to gigabit ethernet ???? imho it's not too expensiv
> e
> nowdays ....
>
> stefan
>
>
>
>
> Axel Gruber
>
> <axelgruber3@g To: vdr@linuxtv.org
>
> mx.de> cc:
>
> Sent by: Subject: [vdr] VDR-Network
> -Traffic-Managment
> vdr-bounce@lin
>
> uxtv.org
>
>
>
>
>
> 17.06.2002
>
> 13:43
>
> Please respond
>
> to vdr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Here i use a small VDR-network with one "main-machine" (4 DVB-Devices)
> and
> 8 Harddrives.
> 2 Clients with only 1 DVB-Device and mounted the Harddrives from the
> Main-Machine.
>
> Everything works fine.
>
> Now i want to expand the harddrivespace and connect a aditional Server
> to
> this Network.
>
> But now i get problems.
>
> VDR allways use the /video device wich has the highes space on it. - so
> if
> i connect
> the Server to the network (for example as /video9) all Vdrīs only rec
> ord to
> this device.
>
> If i only record 1 or 2 Streams at the same time there is no problem -
> but
> if i
> (and my Brother) watch over the Clients (over the LAN) and the main-Mac
> hine
> want to
> record over the Network i get Problems because the netowrk ist too slow
> .
>
> Is there any way to tell VDR that he only shuld use a specifyed number
> of
> recordings over
> the network ?
>
>
> I know this is a realy specific problem - but i donīt have a solution
> for
> it !
>
> CU
>
> Axel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index