[vdr] Re: DVB-t - vdr not correctly passing parameters?

[Dennis Noordsij <dennis.noordsij@wiral.com>]

Hi,

I have previously reported the same problem with DVB-C (QAM_64 and QAM_128 
bouquets). The latest vdr (1.1.12) is supposed to support these different 
settings, but I haven't had a chance to try it out myself yet.

Anyways, just so you don't go crazy, it's happened to other people :-) I am 
sure it will be fixed soon (if it isnt already).

Cheers,
Dennis



On Tuesday 08 October 2002 21:35, you wrote:
> UK DVB-t is now being broadcast by some transmitters using two different
> sets of QAM and code-rate parameters, 16 3/4 and 64 2/3.
>
> Turned my aerial around today to point to one of these and dvbtune gave me
> around 20 extra, mostly empty, channels - signal is poor ATM, but usable.
>
> After a lot of button pressing channels.conf modified OK.
>
> However, vdr doesn't seem to be switching correctly between the two sets
> of channels eg. if I'm watching a channel with C23D0M64B8T2G32Y0
> parameters and change to a channel using these same parameters, the
> channel comes up OK, if I switch to any channel with C34D0M16B8T2G32Y0
> parameters I get nothing and vice versa.
>
> If I manually run dvbstream -qam 16 -cr 3_4 etc | mplayer -  on an
> unavalaible channel I can then reload vdr and tune to the previously
> unavailable channels, but not the others - I have to run dvbstream -qam 64
> -cr 2_3 etc again on another channnel to do that.
>
> Mm... hope that's not too confusing.
>
> At first glance this would seem that maybe vdr isn't passing all
> parameters to the driver on channel change.
>
> Anyone else seeing this? Meantime I suppose I'd better try looking at the
> code :-\
>
> Andy
>
> --
> A. Top posters.
> Q. What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

-- 
She is not refined.  She is not unrefined.  She keeps a parrot.
		-- Mark Twain



--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.