Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: [FINAL TESTING]: text2skin 1.0-rc1



syrius.ml@no-log.org wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de> writes:


Do you like to hunt phantom errors and like unreliability? ;-)
I don't see no reason to place such mean booby traps for the
other programmers in the code/make file.
So what's the reason to allow the usage of non threadsafe non
reentrant libray call in a heavily multi threaded environment?
Since VDR won't use any non threadsafe library functions, what
would be the point in "poisoning"?

To help plugin developpers to use threadsafe functions ?
I really don't see the point for not using poisoning.
Well, then why don't _you_ set up (and maintain) such a "poisoning"
header file and have all plugin authors include it?

I don't want that "poison" stuff in VDR and that's final!

Klaus




Home | Main Index | Thread Index