[linux-dvb] Re: DVB-CI question

[Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>]

On Friday 26 March 2004 17:53, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > Its the complex list handling for fragment reassembly thats the bit I
> > don't see any reason for having cluttering up the kernel. Theres no high
> > bandwidth data being transferred, so theres no real gain in doing in the
> > kernel. However, in the av7110 instance, I can see that perhaps there
> > were other reasons it was done in the firmware, but those are not
> > necessarily the case here.
> >
> > The extra locking in mine is because it is intended to be a generic API
> > implementation for CA devices, along the lines of the other parts of
> > dvb_core, so I cannot make any assumptions about any particular device.
> > Note that the implementation is pefectly happy with dealing with the
> > av7110-style defragmented packets as well, so it could be used to replace
> > the current av7110 opensource CA code with the generic API
> > implementation.
> >
> > I can write sample userspace code for doing the defragmentation if that
> > would help people (I've already released a partial version of it, so I
> > can release that fine).
>
> Well, I would like to avoid changing the (semantics of the) CI API .
>
> Anyway, if you make your code available we can then discuss if
> your proposed changes are after all a good thing.
>
> I'd like to hear Ralph's or Marcus's opinion, as they originally
> wrote the CI code in the av7110 firmware and driver, and I think
> they know a good deal more about that stuff than I do.

Actually, to be entirely honest, I think I had chosen the wrong implementation 
strategy, and got mentally stuck on it. Now that I've removed all that stuff, 
its not actually too bad to do the de/fragmentation in a different way.


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.