[vdr] Re: vdr2divx suggestions ? (poll)

[Sascha Volkenandt <mailbot1@wat.willz.de>]

At Monday 28 October 2002 20:09 Martin Hoffmann wrote:
> Okay, as said above the new rewritten version should feature all things
> from latest 1.6.x version - however if anyone has suggestion for new
> features or ideas, it would be nice to hear from you !
> I hope you understand since i'm in my planing state it's rather easy to
> implement new features.... So if you ever had ideas for new features, but
> were afraid to ask, it's the right time *NOW* ;-)

After looking through some of the answers, I decided to summarize and 
tell my own opinion.
I think the latest features are already promising, but what about a
possibility to encode to vcd/svcd etc. as well, if you use ffmpeg. Maybe
a configuration file to define all formats could be possible (where
you could select codec, bitrate, audio codec etc. into a profile). 
Another thing is the use of PVAstrumento. It should be used automatically
with wine, but that would mean a lot of effort for ppl not using wine 
already. And that for only one program. So would the solution be an own
implementation of the same functionality? I think the mjpegtools have 
most of that functionality, but they are rather hard to use and some of 
them don't support streaming, so intermediate files would be used (which 
is not what I'd like, 'cause I'd like to keep HDD usage low).

Well the conslusion, I guess, is that it has to be decided WHICH tools
will/can/should be used for transcoding.

Greetings,
Sascha Volkenandt



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.