[vdr] Re: Version of 1.3 that works ?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: Version of 1.3 that works ?
From: Sean Carlos <seanc@libero.it>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:56:49 -0500
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <web-859818@aquacard.co.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=help>
List-id: vdr <vdr.mail>
List-owner: <mailto:listmaster@convergence.de>
List-post: <mailto:vdr@linuxtv.org>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=subscribe%20vdr>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?subject=unsubscribe%20vdr>
References: <web-859818@aquacard.co.uk>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

John Grant wrote:

This is NOT flamebait, but I've been following the 1.3.X track for the last month and in terms of actual operation the system is getting worse, not better.

I've been running 1.3.17 on Fedora Core 2 without any stability problems despite not (yet) having applied the thread safe patches. So there are some positive experiences out there! Could your problems be related to patches and/or plugins?

Sean

References:
- [vdr] Version of 1.3 that works ?
  - From: "John Grant" <john.grant@savcredit.co.uk>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: Version of 1.3 that works ?
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: lib tls thread safeness
Previous by thread: [vdr] Re: Version of 1.3 that works ?
Next by thread: [vdr] vdrconvert Problem -- nonCRC stream from movies?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index