[vdr] Re: VDR and 2.6.0-test1?

[Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>]

Steffen Barszus wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2003 19:17 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > > DVB-kernel has a
> > > complete new layout (especially SAA7146 subsystem). So it's time to add
> > > the driver dependent sources to VDR to get it compiling stand-alone
> > > without driver-sources.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean here. Since the API is the same, what should VDR
> > have to worry about which driver version you use?
> >
> > Klaus
> 
> Well as vdr relies anyway on DVB API 3 it would be usefull to add the headers
> to the vdr package. This way I would not need to add DVB/ tree in parallel to
> vdr source. As there is no real need for the way now as far as i have
> understood, it would make things cleaner IMHO. This way f.e. building RPMs
> would be easier (a bit at least).

I don't think it is a good idea if an application contains the header
files of a driver or any other library module.

Having DVB in parallel to VDR is just a suggestion (it's the way I have it).
You can simply change the line

DVBDIR   = ../DVB

in your Make.config file to change this.

Klaus


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.