Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
micael.beronius@telia.com wrote:
>
> Hello Klaus,
>
> >> But if you inspect my code fragment above, I check for stCREATION as
> >> well.
>
> KS> Yes, but you wrote that you were doing this in cCiTransportConnection::Data(), where
> KS> there is no such test at all. I assume you actually did this in
> KS> cCiTransportConnection::CreateConnection(), which is right _below_ the Data() function.
>
> Oops, sorry. That was a cut and paste bug...
>
> KS> However, I suggest the implementation I have uploaded should be better (even though
> KS> it doesn't fix the problem).
>
> I'm sure, I just wanted to see if I should go to bed or stay up. With
> the result I got, the bed won... ;-)
>
> >> My current thought
> >> is that the CI is not reset or initialized correctly.
>
> KS> That's possible - but in that case it would probably mean that there is
> KS> something wrong in the driver/firmware with the "Link Layer" protocol.
>
> Yes, I know. But it seams that people with the 1.6 Revs (3.5" variant)
> are having problems, and not so much other people, which is why I
> suspect some hardware difference.
I have now added checks to the ioctl() calls in cCiTransportLayer::ResetSlot(),
just in case they return an error (will be logged in /var/log/messages).
maybe you want to get the new ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/ci.c and
give it a try...
Klaus
--
_______________________________________________________________
Klaus Schmidinger Phone: +49-8635-6989-10
CadSoft Computer GmbH Fax: +49-8635-6989-40
Hofmark 2 Email: kls@cadsoft.de
D-84568 Pleiskirchen, Germany URL: www.cadsoft.de
_______________________________________________________________
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
- References:
- [vdr] SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Tomas Prybil <tomas.prybil@copper.se>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
- [vdr] Re: SV: CAM support, was Improved CAM support in VDR
- From: micael.beronius@telia.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index